When you look at all this scare that the heterosexual society has created around the term 'gay' that it has developed in the first place, then you find it so strange and hypocritic of the self-identified gays (who are basically feminine gendered guys to various degrees, including straight-acting -- i.e. those who mask their effeminacy by acting masculine, but it doesn't really work), to claim that 'gay' only means what it is defined as, i.e., a man who is attracted to another man, and there's no other meeaning attached by the society to it. That, especially, there's no gender aspect associated with it.
They seem to sincerely believe in this "gay = sexual interest in men' definition, because it suits them and papers up their femininity under a misleading 'sexual' identity. They seek to remove the 'effeminate' reality by not acknowledging it as a part of the definition of 'gay' and treating the effeminacy of gays as just incidental (taking resort to the few misguided straight guys into the gay community, and the straight-acting ones to show that 'gay' doesn't really mean 'effeminate').
The gays have gone to the extent of changing history and historical spaces of who today comprise of the 'gay' space -- such as catamites, berdaches, etc. by removing the effeminate part from these definitions, or in any case highlighting them as ancient 'sexual' identities, rather than 'gender' identities that they were.
If you look at the 'gay' or 'homosexual' articles on wikipedia, that is written by gays themselves, you will find hardly any reference to the connotations that it means effeminate or feminine gendered. This is social engineering on their part.
However, this papering can only be done in their own small LGBT space. What's happening in the wider society, that affects billions and trillions of men, and a similar number of boys, adolescents and young males (who are the most severely affected) is totally different.
No comments:
Post a Comment